MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392968381 · doi:10.5564/mjb.v5i31.3265

Using Maxent to model the distribution of Dasiphora fruticosa (L.) Rydb. in Mongolia

2023· article· en· W4392968381 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Munkhtur Davaagerel, Indree Tuvshintogtokh, Oyunbileg Munkhzul, Damdindorj Manidari, Nyamjantsan Nyambayar

Bibliographic record

VenueMongolian Journal of Botany · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecipitationClimate changeQuarter (Canadian coin)Range (aeronautics)Physical geographyMaximum temperatureEnvironmental scienceGeographyDistribution (mathematics)Mean radiant temperatureClimatologyEcologyMeteorologyBiologyMathematicsArchaeologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to climate change, precipitation variability, temperature rise, an increase in the frequency of natural disasters, and direct and indirect human impact, the range of plant species is changing significantly. Specifically, there has been an increase in gathering plants from nature because of the growing use of these valuable and medicinal plants. Thus, by simulating the plant’s existing range using Maxent simulation, our goal is to determine its area as well as how it would alter in response to climate change. 525 ranges from surveys conducted in 2018, 2020, and 2021 in the Mongolian districts of Khentii, Mongolian Dauria, Khangai, and Khuvsgul were utilized. Based on our research, out of 21 environmental indicators, five are the most significant. It is influenced by 65.2% of precipitation of the warmest quarter, 16.2% of the mean temperature of the warmest quarter, 8.1% of the annual mean temperature, 7.4% of slope, and 3% of total annual precipitation. Currently, 30% of Mongolia’s total land area is suitable for Dasiphora fruticosa cultivation, of which 8% is ideal and 7% is exceptionally suitable. However, the remaining 70% cannot expand. The favorable range of Dasiphora fruticosa tends to shrink as a result of climate change. Сөөгөн боролзгоно (Dasiphora fruticosa (L.) Rydb.) ургамлын тархацыг Монгол орны хэмжээнд Maxent ашиглан загварчлах нь Хураангуй. Уур амьсгалын өөрчлөлт, хур тунадасны хэлбэлзэл, температурын өсөлт, байгалийн гамшигт үзэгдлүүдийн давтамж нэмэгдэх, мөн хүний шууд болон шууд бус нөлөөгөөр ургамлын төрөл зүйлийн тархац ихээхэн өөрчлөгдөж байна. Тэр дундаа эмийн болон ашигт ургамлын хэрэглээ нэмэгдсэнтэй холбоотойгоор байгаль дээрээс нь түүж бэлтгэх нь ихэссэн. Иймд бид Maxent загварчлалаар Сөөгөн боролзгоно ургамлын одоо байгаа тархцын талбайг тогтоож, цаашлаад уур амьсгалын өөрчлөлтөөс хамааран талбайн хэмжээ хэрхэн өөрчлөгдөхийг илрүүлэх зорилготой. Монгол орны Хэнтийн уулын тайга, Монгол Дагуурын уулын ойт хээр, Хангайн уулын ойт хээр, Хөвсгөлийн уулын тайгын тойргуудад 2018, 2020 болон 2021 онд хийгдсэн судалгаагаар цуглуулагдсан 525 тархцын цэгэн мэдээллийг ашигласан. Бидний судалгаагаар орчны 21 үзүүлэлтээс 5 хүчин зүйлс хамгийн их хамааралтай байна. Үүнд зуны улирлын 6-8 сарын хур тунадас 65.2 хувь, зуны улирлын 6-8 сарын дундаж температур 16.2 хувь, жилийн дундаж температур 8.1 хувь, хэвгийн налуу 7.4 хувь, жилийн нийлбэр хур тунадас 3 хувийн нөлөө үзүүлж байна. Одоогийн Сөөгөн боролзгонын ургах тохиромжтой газар Монгол орны нийт газар нутгийн 30 хувийг эзэлж байна үүнээс 8 хувьд нь хамгийн тохиромжтой, 7 хувьд өндөр тохиромжтой. Харин үлдсэн 70 хувьд нь ургах боломжгүй байна. Уур амьсгалын өөрчлөлт нь Сөөгөн боролзгонын тааламжтай тархац нутгийн хэмжээг багасгах чиг хандлагатай байна. Түлхүүр үгс: Maxent загвар, Сөөгөн боролзгоно, уур амьсгалын өөрчлөлт, тархац

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMongolian Journal of Botany→Same topicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change→French-language works237,207→