Des imaginaires rivaux : nationalismes britanniques et écossais, canadiens et québécois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À travers une sociologie historique comparative dans laquelle s’insère une analyse des discours référendaires, la présente thèse vise à analyser l’évolution du nationalisme au cours de la modernité. À travers les cas écossais et britannique, québécois et canadiens, et à l’appui d’un effort d’opérationnalisation du concept d’imaginaire national, nous mettons au jour les mutations affectant un phénomène protéiforme, tant dans ses expressions indépendantistes/souverainistes qu’unionistes. \n_____________________________________________________________________________ \nMOTS-CLÉS DE L’AUTEUR : Nation ; Nationalisme ; Identité nationale ; Imaginaires ; Mémoire ; Rivalité ; Angleterre ; Écosse ; Royaume-Uni ; Grande-Bretagne ; Québec ; Canada ; Référendum ; Autodétermination ; Fédéralisme ; Indépendantisme ; Souverainisme ; Unionisme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".