MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392969647 · doi:10.1109/tip.2024.3374072

MM-Net: A MixFormer-Based Multi-Scale Network for Anatomical and Functional Image Fusion

2024· article· en· W4392969647 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Image Fusion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsImage fusionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceFusionPattern recognition (psychology)Feature (linguistics)Fusion rulesSource codeGeneralizationBenchmark (surveying)Image (mathematics)Domain (mathematical analysis)Scale (ratio)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anatomical and functional image fusion is an important technique in a variety of medical and biological applications. Recently, deep learning (DL)-based methods have become a mainstream direction in the field of multi-modal image fusion. However, existing DL-based fusion approaches have difficulty in effectively capturing local features and global contextual information simultaneously. In addition, the scale diversity of features, which is a crucial issue in image fusion, often lacks adequate attention in most existing works. In this paper, to address the above problems, we propose a MixFormer-based multi-scale network, termed as MM-Net, for anatomical and functional image fusion. In our method, an improved MixFormer-based backbone is introduced to sufficiently extract both local features and global contextual information at multiple scales from the source images. The features from different source images are fused at multiple scales based on a multi-source spatial attention-based cross-modality feature fusion (CMFF) module. The scale diversity of the fused features is further enriched by a series of multi-scale feature interaction (MSFI) modules and feature aggregation upsample (FAU) modules. Moreover, a loss function consisting of both spatial domain and frequency domain components is devised to train the proposed fusion model. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms several state-of-the-art fusion methods on both qualitative and quantitative comparisons, and the proposed fusion model exhibits good generalization capability. The source code of our fusion method will be available at https://github.com/yuliu316316.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it