MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Afinal, o que querem os bebês?

2021· article· pt· W4392972353 on OpenAlex
Gabriela Guarnieri de Campos Tebet, Anete Abramowicz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDebates em educação · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Pedagogy and Practices
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyEpistemologyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo visa discutir o bebê como categoria analítica a partir de algumas ideias de Gilles Deleuze sobre a diferença. Utiliza-se o conceito de multidão retomado por Antonio Negri, Michael Hardt e Paolo Virno e as ideias de Fernand Deligny sobre o agir e querer. Do ponto de vista metodológico, propomos a cartografia em um esforço de traçar linhas percorridas pelos bebês e sobre as quais se movimentam. Buscamos também evidenciar as forças as quais buscam atuar sobre eles. Trata-se de um ensaio teórico-conceitual que se produz na intersecção entre a pedagogia, as epistemologias da diferença e a sociologia da infância no sentido de contribuir para a educação e os estudos de bebês na direção da multidão e da multiplicidade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it