MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Notas sobre el espacio biográfico: visibilidad y escucha en Chicas muertas de Selva Almada

2022· article· es· W4392972436 on OpenAlexaff
Tatiana Navallo

Bibliographic record

VenueVisitas al Patio · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Cultures and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este trabajo analizo Chicas muertas (2014) de Selva Almada, en tanto proyecto escriturario en el que “el espacio biográfico” (Arfuch [2002] 2010) se torna elemento nuclear, al evidenciar una serie de estrategias de control extremo ejercido en cuerpos y subjetividades femeninas, como son los femicidios. Este espacio biográfico, en relación con las condiciones de lectura y demandas feministas actuales, no solo alberga diversas prácticas sociales de la violencia, sino que integra un archivo hospitalario, en los términos propuestos por Szurmuk y Virué (2020).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVisitas al PatioSame topicIndigenous Cultures and HistoryFrench-language works237,207