New gravitational model and quantization formula of the gravitational constant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The existing theories of gravitation cannot solve the problem of the gravitational quantization, and the exact value of the Newtonian constant of gravitation G has not been determined. Therefore, the essence of gravity needs to be deeply explored. Here, we show that a new gravitational model is proposed, which is of the viewpoint that the universe is a composition of elementary particles and gravitational lines, and the elementary particles are connected by gravitational lines, and the essence of gravity can be tension of the gravitational lines. Based on Newton's law of gravitation, quantum mechanics, and simple harmonic wave equation, the dynamic model of gravitational driven photons is constructed: G m g 2 / l p = Δ n ⋅ h c / λ . The quantization formula of the gravitational constant is derived: G q = K h 3 / 2 π c 2 m g 4 . The calculated average is G = 6.678 804 09 × 10−11 m3 kg−1 s−2. Compared with the recommendations value of the CODATA in 2018, the deviation obtained is 0.067%. The quantum formula of gravity is derived: f G = K h 3 / 2 π c 2 m g 2 . The gravitational model proposed in this paper solves the problem of gravitation quantization, deduces the formula of the gravitational constant and gravitational quantum, and provides a new theoretical method for deeply revealing the essence of gravity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".