Experiment on the reflection and emission of light
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Suppose the velocity of light is independent of the source velocity. In that case, the reflection of light as a mechanical phenomenon predicts a zero fringe shift when applied to the Michelson interferometer with a particular geometry, a <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.40</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> fringe shift when applied to the Michelson interferometer presented in the Michelson‐Morley experiment, and a <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>210</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> fringe shift when applied to the interferometer presented in this study, which contradicts the zero fringe shift experimental result. If the velocity of light depends on the source velocity, the reflection of light as a mechanical phenomenon predicts a zero fringe shift for all three experiments. The study of emission, propagation, and reflection of light as mechanical phenomena concludes that the optical phenomena are in an inertial frame as in the frame at absolute rest and cannot prove the motion of an inertial frame in which sources and mirrors belong to that inertial frame.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it