Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Bibliographic record
VenueLecture notes in computer science · 2024
Typebook
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Information and Communications TechnologyUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaCentro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Baja CaliforniaCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'EnvironnementRégion NormandieTechnische Universität DortmundUniversidade da CoruñaUniversitat Oberta de CatalunyaEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemUniversity of South AfricaUniversity of TsukubaUniversidad de GranadaSyddansk UniversitetITMO UniversityUniversidade Nova de LisboaUniversidade de CoimbraSilesian University of TechnologyUniversidad Complutense de MadridUniversität BielefeldMichigan State UniversityNewcastle UniversityUniversità degli Studi di TrentoTechnische Universität DarmstadtHakim Sabzevari UniversityKing's College LondonCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueJohannes Gutenberg-Universität MainzUniversité du LuxembourgUniversità degli Studi di MilanoUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeUniversitetet i OsloUniversität zu LübeckSorbonne UniversitéUniversità degli Studi di SalernoQueensland University of TechnologyUniversidad Politécnica de MadridUniversidad de ExtremaduraUniversidad de GuadalajaraEuskal Herriko UnibertsitateaUniversity of TwenteHong Kong Baptist UniversityYork UniversityUniversiteit LeidenIndian Council of Agricultural ResearchSwansea UniversityRadboud UniversiteitUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosEdinburgh Napier UniversityCarl von Ossietzky Universität OldenburgUniversity of SouthamptonIran Telecommunication Research CenterDe Montfort UniversityUniversità per Stranieri di PerugiaUniversity of ExeterUniversidad de CádizUniversidad de MálagaUniversity of Cape TownInstitut "Jožef Stefan"Università degli Studi di PerugiaHeriot-Watt UniversityPomona CollegeOstravská Univerzita v OstravěTechnische Universität DresdenPolitecnico di TorinoUniversity of Central FloridaYeditepe ÜniversitesiTecnológico Nacional de MéxicoČeské Vysoké Učení Technické v PrazeUniversità degli Studi di ParmaUniversidad de SevillaSveučilište u ZagrebuQueen Mary University of LondonUniversität Basel
KeywordsComputer scienceEvolutionary computationComputationArtificial intelligenceTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithm
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itQuick stats
Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno