MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392979193 · doi:10.24815/jimap.v7i4.24851

Perancangan Taman Museum Kerajaan Aceh

2023· article· id· W4392979193 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Januar Jabbar Aden, Mirza Irwansyah, Husnus Sawab

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Arsitektur dan Perencanaan · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnvironmental Engineering and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyIslamArtCartographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstrakIndonesia adalah negara yang mayoritas agamanya adalah Islam. Aceh dianggap sebagai tempat dimulainya penyebaran Islam di Indonesia dan memainkan peran penting dalam penyebaran Islam di Asia Tenggara. Pada awal abad ke-17, Sejarah Aceh diwarnai oleh kebebasan politik dan penolakan keras terhadap kendali orang asing, termasuk bekas penjajah Belanda dan pemerintah Indonesia. Jika dibandingkan dengan dengan provinsi lainnya, Aceh adalah wilayah yang sangat konservatif (menjunjung tinggi nilai agama) dan kerajaan Islam tertua di Indonesia yaitu Samudra Pasai dan berkembang menjadi kerajaan yang lebih besar yaitu Kerajaan Aceh. Namun sangat disayangkan belum adanya tempat yang dapat menuliskan sejarah Kerajaan Aceh tersebut. Persentase penduduk Muslim di Aceh adalah yang tertinggi di Indonesia dan mereka hidup sesuai syariah Islam. Berbeda dengan kebanyakan provinsi lain di Indonesia, Aceh memiliki otonomi yang diatur sendiri karena alasan sejarah. Agar tempat penulisan ini memiliki unsur yang rekreatif, maka bentuk tempat dibuat dengan bentuk taman museum (museum outdoor). Sehingga tempat ini dapat memiliki 2 fungsi sekaligus yaitu tempat konservasi sejarah dan fungsi sebagai objek wisata edukatif. dengan hal ini pengunjung juga dapat melakukan 2 aktifitas sekaligus yaitu rekreasi dan belajar. Taman museum ini dibungkus dengan gaya islamic garden supaya dapat merefleksikan bagaimana bentuk Kerajaan Aceh terdahulu yang banyak terpengaruhi dengan gaya Kerajaan Turki. Taman ini diharapkan dapat menambah pemasukan daerah dari sektor pariwisata dan menambah nilai historis pada wilayah aceh itu sendiri.Design of the Aceh Kingdom Museum ParkAbstractIndonesia is a country where the majority religion is Islam. Aceh is considered as the starting place for the spread of Islam in Indonesia and played an important role in the spread of Islam in Southeast Asia. In the early 17th century, Aceh's history was marked by political freedom and strong resistance to the control of foreigners, including the former Dutch colonialists and the Indonesian government. When compared to other provinces, Aceh is a very conservative region (upholding religious values) and the oldest Islamic kingdom in Indonesia, namely Samudra Pasai, developed into a larger kingdom, namely the Kingdom of Aceh. But it is very unfortunate that there is no place that can write down the history of the Kingdom of Aceh. The percentage of Muslim population in Aceh is the highest in Indonesia and they live according to Islamic sharia. Unlike most other provinces in Indonesia, Aceh has self-governing autonomy for historical reasons. So that the place for writing has a recreational element, the shape of the place is made in the form of a museum park (outdoor museum). So that this place can have 2 functions at once, namely a place of historical conservation and a function as an educational tourist attraction. With this, visitors can also do 2 activities at once, namely recreation and study. The museum garden is wrapped in an Islamic garden style so that it can reflect how the former Aceh Kingdom was heavily influenced by the Turkish Empire style. This park is expected to increase regional income from the tourism sector and add historical value to the Aceh region itself.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Arsitektur dan PerencanaanSame topicEnvironmental Engineering and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207