MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392980183 · doi:10.1109/tns.2024.3378628

MOLLER Spectrometer Magnet Design With Measured Mechanical Properties of Irradiated S2-Glass Reinforced Cyanate Ester Resin at Elevated Temperature

2024· article· en· W4392980183 on OpenAlexaff
S. Gopinath, E. Sun, Wesley Frey, S. Rahman, D. Kashy, Michael Dion, J. Fast, Ruben Fair, C. Gal, C. Ghosh, K.S. Kumar, J. Mammei, K. Paschke, Andrea E. Hoyt Haight, H. Babcock, D. T. Spayde, Z. S. Demiroglu, N. Roshanshah, P. K. Ghoshal

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSuperconducting Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersHigh Energy Physics
KeywordsCyanate esterMaterials scienceComposite materialFlexural strengthIrradiationMagnetRadiation resistanceTungstenRadiationShear strength (soil)EpoxyOpticsNuclear physicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to retire the risk of maintaining the integrity of S2-glass reinforced CTD-403 (a cyanate ester resin) that is exposed to radiation and elevated temperature over the life of the MOLLER experiment in experimental Hall A at Jefferson Lab. In this paper, the shear strength and flexural modulus of irradiated S2-glass reinforced CTD-403 specimens were measured at 65 °C (the magnets are to operate at less than 65 °C) under two scenarios: vacuum and gaseous nitrogen. The testing method is the Short-Beam Shear (SBS) test according to ASTM D2344. The specimens were exposed to neutrons and gamma-rays up to 124 MGy. The results show that specimens have excellent resistance against radiation, only 23% degradation of apparent shear strength with 124 MGy at 65 °C under vacuum. At the highest dose areas of the coils tungsten plates are used to reduce the radiation dose to the resin system. The conclusion is that S2-glass reinforced CTD-403 is well suited for electrical insulation of MOLLER magnets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear ScienceSame topicSuperconducting Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207