MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392980425 · doi:10.1109/ism59092.2023.00042

Towards Efficient Multi-view Representation Learning

2023· article· en· W4392980425 on OpenAlexaff
Kai Liu, Zheng Guo, Lei Gao, Naimul Khan, Ling Guan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRepresentation (politics)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proliferation of deep neural networks (DNNs) has drawn unprecedented interest in the study of various contents such as image, audio, video, to name a few. However, due to the data-driven nature, the high computational requirement and slow running time are considered as Achilles’ heels of DNN-based algorithms, limiting the progress of DNNs in time-sensitive applications. Recently, distinct discriminant canonical correlation analysis network (DDCCANet), a multi-view neural network, has shown great generalizability across multiple application domains, both analytically and experimentally. However, Although the computational requirement and running time by DDCCANet are more manageable than DNN-based algorithms, they can be substantially further improved. This paper proposes two new algorithms for multi-view feature representation learning, namely incremental DDCCANet (IDDCCANet) with substantial save in computational memory and GPU-accelerated DDCCANet (GADDCCANet) with drastically accelerated running time, forming a practically significant platform for multi-view feature representation learning. To validate the power of the proposed algorithms, experiments are conducted on several data sets with different types of inputs (e.g., raw image pixels, classical and DNN-based features). Experimental results clearly show that the proposed algorithms provide promising solutions to address the two longstanding challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Pose and Action RecognitionFrench-language works237,207