Towards Efficient Multi-view Representation Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The proliferation of deep neural networks (DNNs) has drawn unprecedented interest in the study of various contents such as image, audio, video, to name a few. However, due to the data-driven nature, the high computational requirement and slow running time are considered as Achilles’ heels of DNN-based algorithms, limiting the progress of DNNs in time-sensitive applications. Recently, distinct discriminant canonical correlation analysis network (DDCCANet), a multi-view neural network, has shown great generalizability across multiple application domains, both analytically and experimentally. However, Although the computational requirement and running time by DDCCANet are more manageable than DNN-based algorithms, they can be substantially further improved. This paper proposes two new algorithms for multi-view feature representation learning, namely incremental DDCCANet (IDDCCANet) with substantial save in computational memory and GPU-accelerated DDCCANet (GADDCCANet) with drastically accelerated running time, forming a practically significant platform for multi-view feature representation learning. To validate the power of the proposed algorithms, experiments are conducted on several data sets with different types of inputs (e.g., raw image pixels, classical and DNN-based features). Experimental results clearly show that the proposed algorithms provide promising solutions to address the two longstanding challenges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".