An interface tracking, finite volume code for modeling axisymmetric implosion of a rotating liquid metal liner with free surface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present Integrated System Model-hydrodynamics (ISM-hydro)—an interface tracking, finite volume code for modeling a shaped implosion of a rotating, initially cylindrical, fluid shell (liner) with a free surface. The code is a novel implementation of the mixed Lagrangian–Eulerian approach, applied to a compressible fluid in an axisymmetric geometry described by cylindrical coordinates (r, ϕ, z). In ISM-hydro, a structured quadrilateral mesh follows fluid elements in the r-direction (radially Lagrangian) and is fixed in the z-direction (axially Eulerian). This approach accurately captures the motion of the liner's free surface, making it an interface tracking method. Using this mesh, we derive a finite volume discretization of the axisymmetric Euler equations for a rotating compressible fluid that has an exact balance of kinetic energy. An extensive comparison between ISM-hydro and the open-source software OpenFOAM is presented; results for different test cases show very good agreement in simulated implosion trajectories and flow fields. ISM-hydro is the purely hydrodynamic component of the Integrated System Model (ISM), a framework developed at General Fusion (GF) for comprehensive predictive modeling of GF's magnetized target fusion (MTF) scheme, where an imploding rotating liquid metal liner compresses a magnetized plasma target to fusion conditions. Among advantages of the code is its speed: a full implosion simulation with a coarse mesh takes on the order of one minute on a single core while preserving high accuracy. This makes ISM-hydro a valuable tool for the design optimization of GF's MTF machines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".