Pengaruh Kombinasi Air Kelapa Muda Dan Gliserol pada Presevasi Sperma Ikan Mas (Cyprinus carpio)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh dari penambahan pengencer air kelapa muda dan gliserol terhadap viabilitas sperma ikan mas (Cyprinus carpio) dan perlakuan yang terbaik pada penyimpanan sperma ikan mas. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Laboratorium Fakultas Kelautan dan Perikanan Universitas Nusa Cendana, selama kurang lebih 1 bulan (Oktober) 2021. Metode penelitian disusun dalam rancangan acak lengkap (RAL) dengan 5 perlakuan yaitu perlakuan 1: 0,25 ml sperma + 100% air kelapa muda, perlakuan 2 : 0,25 ml sperma + 75% air kelapa muda + 25% gliserol, perlakuan 3: 0,25 ml sperma + 50% air kelapa muda + 50% gliserol. perlakuan 4: 0,25 ml sperma + 25% air kelapa muda + 75% gliserol dan perlakuan 5 : 0,25 ml sperma + 100% gliserol. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan penambahan air kelapa muda dan gliserol berpengaruh terhadap motilitas spermatozoa ikan mas (Cyprinus carpio) dan spermatozoa masih bertahan hidup selama 4 hari, namun semakin lama disimpan maka motilitas akan semakin menurun dan penyimpanan sperma dengan perbandingan dosis 75% air kelapa muda + 25% gliserol (perlakuan B) memberikan hasil terbaik.
 
 Kata Kunci: Air Kelapa Muda, Gliserol, Motilitas, Viabilitas, Sperma Ikan Mas
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".