Adversarial Attacks on Medical Segmentation Model via Transformation of Feature Statistics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning-based segmentation models have made a profound impact on medical procedures, with U-Net based computed tomography (CT) segmentation models exhibiting remarkable performance. Yet, even with these advances, these models are found to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, a problem that equally affects automatic CT segmentation models. Conventional adversarial attacks typically rely on adding noise or perturbations, leading to a compromise between the success rate of the attack and its perceptibility. In this study, we challenge this paradigm and introduce a novel generation of adversarial attacks aimed at deceiving both the target segmentation model and medical practitioners. Our approach aims to deceive a target model by altering the texture statistics of an organ while retaining its shape. We employ a real-time style transfer method, known as the texture reformer, which uses adaptive instance normalization (AdaIN) to change the statistics of an image’s feature.To induce transformation, we modify the AdaIN, which typically aligns the source and target image statistics. Through rigorous experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Our adversarial samples successfully pass as realistic in blind tests conducted with physicians, surpassing the effectiveness of contemporary techniques. This innovative methodology not only offers a robust tool for benchmarking and validating automated CT segmentation systems but also serves as a potent mechanism for data augmentation, thereby enhancing model generalization. This dual capability significantly bolsters advancements in the field of deep learning-based medical and healthcare segmentation models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".