Catalogue des imprimés des xv e et xvi e siècles dans les collections de l’Université du Québec à Montréal, sous la direction de Brenda Dunn-Lardeau. Montréal, Presses de l’université du Québec, 2013.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Revue internationale des sociétés secrètes (1912-1939) was known as one of the first French magazines to have reproduced and published the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Its purpose was not only limited to the diffusion of the Russian anti-Jewish forgery, but is also played a major role in transmitting and perpetuating anti-Jewish, anti-Freemasonry and anti-occultist ideas and theories from the period of the Belle Époque to the Second World War. The archives of the magazine, purchased by the Bibliothèque nationale de France in 2000, provide a significant and unpublished documentation highlighting some historical phenomena extending far beyond the anti-Jewish, anti-Masonic and anti-occult underworld.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.023 | 0.041 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.111 | 0.021 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".