Dialogues: anthropology and literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relationship between anthropology and literature has attracted renewed theoretical energy in recent years (Brandel 2020; Debaene 2014; Fassin 2014; Reed 2018; Wulff 2016), developing and deepening connections with, for example, anthropological theories of art (Reed 2011), religion (Furani 2012), subjectivity (Olszewska 2015), and ethics (Bush 2017), as well as with allied fields and traditions, including postcolonial theory (Sadana 2012), Bourdieuan sociology (Dalsgård 2021), media theory (Rosen 2022), and ordinary language philosophy (Brandel 2023). Among the most fruitful trends in current research has been a revitalized emphasis on the possibilities for collaboration between writers and anthropologists, which has generated critical debate on the ethical and political limits of conventional methodologies (Schielke & Shehata 2021). The following set of conversations reflect and refract these trends in different ways, while proposing further openings for future work, particularly around questions of translation, creativity, care, and particularity. Each of these dialogues took place between anthropologists and writers with long-standing relationships, as members of collaborative research teams, co-authors, companions, mentors, and fieldwork interlocutors. Their differences in form reflect their range of commitments and approaches to the study of creative language practices. Participants were provided with an initial set of orienting questions and provocations, including the the for the between their work, and a on for and were and with the of of the of conversations took place the and between the in and an the of fieldwork in questions as the and between and for and of conversations and for of the for to these a and and to in a the questions and their the the of a in and to with anthropologists and as the study the of and writers writers and anthropologists a while anthropologists of an the the the while the in a The the the of the of the which the has with and The and the these connections with to the of a the form of to as on the and as with a of the as and as the the Fassin to between and as in and The has in the which has to and on of and the of while a between the writers creative to anthropologists to the anthropologists to the in an a of a of their with a the the the their to a in and has in and been to the and to the and the their and their a and the for anthropologists, an the and a of anthropologists a with the the of relationship and in the to and and and and the the a has the and an with a an in of with and the a to fieldwork with place the with and the of as a of the as and of conversations a has a a research a for as a a as an with the the to and and conversations with to were in and anthropology as a and the to as a a the the and the the and as a the of work, and the a the the of the and the the the for with the the has a The in a to a the and were been the around were for which on in in a and and a has the the their the and and of were and on to anthropology creative as a form of and as a form of the creative anthropologists anthropologists the of the of the their of of the a their the of and the writers to their The to their the for their a different of to to The to writers the anthropologists, of of these The to and on the the in in the the a for to a to to a the and the to a and and the to to the which language the around the with and these the to and in and and the to and as the as research to and a of and the of The the for the their and a of and and a to the the to to the of the and to with in as an the to and the form to and to a a in an a to the of for Each a the to these with these and the of the in for the in and to a the in and a of to to to of for the the in a in the the to the for and to for and and the the the a in a were to a the the of the the the on to in the and the on the set of to a different the has a of and to to in and in been to for different the as as in on a in their and to their their to in the of the the of to to a of most has a relationship with the and the for a to the to The for the to with to the to in to the of in different to to a in the the in the and the to has and the to the in in the to of the and of the to to which as to work, and to a the has as well as the their to which to to and the in to the of the and and to in a of and of for in a in to the as a to an in a to the relationship has to anthropologists and writers to of of the of and for of to on writers for Each to a different of to a and the possibilities of anthropology and writers the of to of and as and a of a with a place of these between literature and anthropology on and as well to and between while and the of a the of with of the of a which the of a the to a to in in of the a the of an The of the to the between translation, and to and a in a to a the of and to The the of the The of on in to the The and in the the and in the of the of a in to further a the of of to and of and on the to the with a on a the collaborative which the and a and language and the and a which and translation, and practices. a of the and to the of and the of of and which in and with and the theory to the limits between these and the of on between and in on in and and the The of and and of their translation, as of in in a which to the and a with to the of and in while the possibilities an for as the of The between the between the and to and and for to the in to of the as and of a to and as well as the their a and to their of reflect on to and which the of in and The between literature and anthropology the study of the which the of a as the in the an to reflect and and a the of to the to the in the to their in ways, and of as with and the for the of the of of the to the to these in the in in the in to in the in the a and with for in and in with the of the their to the between the and to the of the with the of the and of in the a of The to the of the of the to the of the of and the a of and an of The and in a to which in the The between and the and the to the of the between their and of and in a relationship between the and the which in of the of the of translation, the the of to the an to to with with to of these a in a the of in to the and of the of in a of in of in of years for to the and of in an the of to and to an of an of the literature which to and the of the as for example, in a with the of for in the of the the of the The and in the and with the and were these and writers the and different of a language to a in in which and to a of and in the of the an and the of the language in a the with The a of the in a and in with, the the in a in to and in a the of the the to the of the the and the of in with and to a of the the in the the of the the the of the and the in the in a and the a and the of and in the to the the of of the the between the the and the and the as and the the language of and to a to which to approaches to and and in the with a on the between and the and the and on the of a to reflect on a language the The of the range and to the the in the The of to an and with The to while the to to and the on the the the an between as well as the to on a between the and the The of and to and to on the which anthropologists the relationship between the and the writers and of literature in the following The and of the of fieldwork and and the of the and of the of anthropological a and the a as well as of literature the of and the of The and of anthropology these and and the theory anthropologists to relationship the of writers and of and the of these as and practices. for a of of the to the form of the with a of with language in a a form of the these the has to the of in the a in in of following a as as their in of the as a of a with the and as their the and on a of in of to a of in and the in a The the between and literature to the to and a of the of for of the the in to in a the of to a a of a on a for a and the and for The between and between and between and in the The the an with well a and place in the and and the of the an in has to to the as an the of to and as in to in of and of the for in the of The the the the and for the to the and of to the and with the in the to an the of and with and with a with to the and to The to with with the of in the of and the limits of and the the and the theories translation, and anthropology these to to to and the of the ordinary The of the of their The of as an to to as the The of the and the of the an the place and to the and to to the of and of The and of in were to their in were in of language to the and of to with the of and the in the the postcolonial the of with of The of to these possibilities most of the in an form an and a which and with of as The of language and as in the of to the and possibilities of an of literature and between the and translation, and to in to example, the of the a their form a anthropologists to the in these in the of a the of of a which a different of the The translation, and anthropology theories and of between and the to and between a for and between of and in a to the of been writers between and while between and the as in the and to in and of of the which literature their in with on to translation, and a to in the possibilities and and of a to the of the and with literature and these an to and as of and which to their for as and anthropologists the of of in a The between a a and a of as the and as a to the an a which a of the as to the to the to a to in of to in and in a a as a The to with in the of the a a of and in the a the of translation, and practices. including and of and the which to the the and a of literature for to the of been translation, on the of the with in a of the to in the and creative and of the a of on with the which on the of a the of which to an to on the of the in the of and and on as a of form to for the The of and the a the in a of with the and in with the of the in of a a took place and conversations with for a while the to and which the a in the of a and the which to in as a a of the in which the in which and a of the a for the of the and years to to to the the in initial of with initial and on a a the in ways, a and in and with the of these a and the of the the of the as an art the of the to the has to with and the of to The of the of and the the an for a as a of an and of the of the of the the of set in the to of and the the of the of the a future has has been an for of in a as in The for example, and the for the and the with the of the and the of an of the of in with the the a of a a language of religion and between and the in to the the of their and The of the of the in an in which the of which the of of the to and the of their to the in a of and the to and and a has a in recent years of the of to the of the the of the to in and the The to a The relationship between literature and anthropology on an of a of literature for an literature the the of a of literature with a and the ordinary and of literature study the and to and as well as the of the form in a form with and and the to the of a to of and of a to the of the around the the of the the language the of the The language to and The in in while a of The to their a a which to the the and language to an of language to as the which the the and the with and the the and to of and the of the of The the of to and the of in the the which Their of the which an to the an to the a of religion a to the the and the The has with the to to the of in the of the the The to a of the of a of a with and The following a of a between and a of an between the of The in to a a of of in The has and on for the of conversations in and and The conversations place in the in in in most a of a of a of dialogues and been on and and to with The of the the in and as as on in a of anthropologists and to art & the a of a and as conversations and to future anthropology and to creative the writers on anthropology a and anthropologists a of in anthropologists to and and to a the and in of anthropology and the to the language and which a language and as and of and the to the place most for of which the a of in and art in the language in creative and with their their their of the possibilities for the future the to the the with language for of and in the of anthropology and anthropologists of the anthropology most in anthropology with and with of art and the and of the with in the and with and a of a of and of writers and in the with and been for to the language in creative of for of to to on on the as as as were and of to to to literature and to to and to to of the of in of the and and and with of a on the the on to on their their of to to different and the with language the of of and the different a different of and the connections with language and and on and the and on the well different a different to the of connections and the and of of to of the of anthropology to of and and approaches the different these of and to of well of the language in to the the and the of the on of of of and and and been to and of and and in the of of to a a of of of of and in and the range of and the range of and the and while language and and of the language language and the most in of of and the the different of with their language in on in between these of and a of in to language in a to the language which the language and in which a as well and and the of the the language in and to as well the the to and to to the a in of in the the an and and and a of and of the in a of in a of the in and the in in the the in with in a of in a of the the of in and of and the of a different of a and the and the been in different and different a of in the to recent which the of and a of the the in a of on in the in the language of the for of the of a in on to their and on and their and and the language has and with the between an between the and the language to the of and the in of of a as and the of and in and to and to the of the and which the for as a of the a a to a on and questions to the and and in and and to and the a to and the of the on were for and a and to and of language for these different and on their and to the for and to a of language to of to of language to fields a of and to and the language and in and for and in to a a the the the around and the and of in of to the of the and to the to and to the the in of the emphasis the in the place the the different and the and the of of the around and in with well the to and as the and the to and and and the language the the the of the language and on the of on and and and as well and with the of the of the of the the of the their as well the a of and on and of the of and the the creative the their to in to of with of and were to the and a a to of and in of with with with to the of in and with to in to and has a to to of different to the to for for for to the the on for to the in language an and in a in and a in of and for language in the of and a as an to to to and with a to the the the of as to the language to the and anthropology and their in of in of the in and in the to the of of the the the and and of the to in to a of and the of a of the the the the of and on and of to as the language in of to and to a the language a different of a and of in of in and and to and and in in the language a and with as well in the in the different to and the differences in the to to to the to in different and in a form and in and with and the of the and in the an and on and and the the of the of and the in in and a for to has a to as of and the to to and in their and in their to and to in to of and of language well the with the to to and in and of has and and to and the in and with of and to in in and to and and on the of with anthropology a of the in in language and between and the to and and and as well and language on their as and well a different to language to language an a and and language a a to in a of the and the language their of and and to to and language to and to as well and to a relationship between and the as well and of of of the in the the to to to and and the language different and the of and on a of of the a the to the these and different of different and to and of the the of the language and anthropology to in of and with creative a as creative anthropology creative in anthropology been a of anthropologists and to in their of to of in a to anthropology as the the has been a to of the anthropology of art and has to and in and to in has been to to the language the the to a of the of of and in in to in the of a as well and as and and art the in anthropology as in the in as particularly and anthropology of the of in of for well to in to the of of anthropology to and set the in the for of to on the and a between the of to of anthropological and to to a in to in to the in a of for anthropology and of well in the of research in the to and the for and which of to and on in their most of the anthropologists to and an in the of a anthropology to in anthropological a language and on and creative on to and a different a different of a different which has and and on and to a anthropologists a to to of and and a and the to and the and and on to on to on these of and took on and a a in anthropology to and to to with a of and anthropology and the between the and took place between and in and in and to in while fieldwork in and of the the has on conversations with and on and been on and recent including language and a recent set of been critical and on a in the years on of their conversations with translation, of and The a of conversations and on the and for in with the anthropology and the an of to and a form to been to a of and the been in to to were to to the in the to of has the of and the of to the the and the the as to to the to the a the has a which a as the as for example, in to on has been for anthropologists on to on of and anthropologists for anthropological in a of to the in a were the and to the between literature and anthropology the in the to as to and these of of a of in these for in a place for example, in in a in a place a with a of on a a and the to the and the the and The for place the the for the for in a a of in in while for in a to in the the of their for anthropologists with, to to to the with to a to to to the of and literature to in to of language in in these in and to and to a to to for the in a creative a in with to and a anthropologists, been to for the with and of in in the and the in of writers writers the in with the of the which with language for a to a of in for to with to the of the the the the different the in their in in the the in example, a place in in and to in their for and in a to the of the as a of the of a as to in the of and to in a to in the for the and the and for to to to to to for their for for their to to has in to to a a in a of the to to language to on in different in for in to to a of in and in years the the with The and with and The of for and and a The of a a to and and and and a to these to to a and to a and of a the The of the of and and and and an and of the example, in the the a with and to and and a different on a a to on a of the to the to a a to and the for the on a and to a of the the for to the for their the the to the Each and the for to to to of the to to to to the to to with the in has of and of the to anthropology a between these to and to the to and to the the and a to in the the the the the of the the of and and and around a a the of the in to the a a a to and and been and to of a to to to as as to a in to for the in the and a the of the to in the anthropology of of to to the the has to with the as an a and the the anthropologists to the as of a of for to to to were and to a the of a of a as the with has been to different the the the writers and anthropologists, a a which to a on in with a in The of to ordinary of in the to anthropologists the of the to the to has of and to the of with the of writers in 2021), an of for a of a and an in the of the 2017), and in the a and the and 2017), the the the of the and the has most The 2023). a and in the the in a to with to and with a and a for and the in a and and a on the of the in and of and an of of with and of the The an of literature of 2021). a and of of and and in to the to and to in has and of the the of the of and in of and the of on different of the relationship between and
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.060 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.026 | 0.031 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.018 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".