MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393013359 · doi:10.1002/pd.6543

Prenatal diagnosis of <i>ROR‐2</i> related Robinow syndrome presenting with fetal ultrasound findings of mesomelia, vertebral, digital and genital abnormalities

2024· article· en· W4393013359 on OpenAlexaff
Liying Yang, Patrick Shannon, Rachel Silver, Maian Roifman, Carin Yates, David Chitayat

Bibliographic record

VenuePrenatal Diagnosis · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontal BossingHypertelorismMedicineMacrocephalyAnatomyBrachycephalyOcciputSyndactylyPathologySkull

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Autosomal recessive ROR2 ‐Robinow syndrome is caused by pathogenic variants in the ROR2 gene. Fetal ultrasound done on our patient at 24 + 3/7 weeks gestation showed macrocephaly, brachycephaly, flat face, prominent forehead, mild frontal bossing, lower thoracic hemivertebrae, digital abnormalities and micropenis. Fetal trio whole exome sequencing done on amniocytes showed two pathogenic compound heterozygous variants in the ROR2 gene, c.1324 C &gt; T; p.(Arg442*) maternally inherited and c.1366dup; p.(Leu456Profs*3) apparently de novo. c.1324 C &gt; T; p.(Arg442*) is a nonsense variant resulting in protein truncation reported to be associated with RRS 3 . c.1366dup; p.(Leu456Profs*3) is a frameshift variant predicted to result in protein truncation reported to segregate with the disease in multiple affected individuals from a single large family with distal symphalangism of the fourth finger. Fetal autopsy following pregnancy termination showed a large head with low‐set ears, facial abnormalities, mesomelic bone shortening, hemivertebra, fused S3 and S4 vertebral bodies, several fused rib heads and short penis with buried shaft.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrenatal DiagnosisSame topicWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerFrench-language works237,207