MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393017369 · doi:10.7202/1108446ar

La ventilation non invasive chez l’adulte : testez vos connaissances !

2023· article· fr· W4393017369 on OpenAlexaff
Lysane Paquette, Gabriela Peguero-Rodriguez, Marie-Lyne Lemieux, Valérie Lebel, Mohamed Ait Si M’hamed

Bibliographic record

VenueSoins d’urgence La revue de l’Association des infirmières et infirmiers d’urgence du Québec · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsLachine HospitalMcGill University Health CentreCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des LaurentidesUniversity of OttawaUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentilation (architecture)GeographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La ventilation non invasive (VNI), telle que la ventilation à pression positive à deux niveaux (en anglais - bi-level positive airway pressure [BiPAP]) ou la ventilation positive en continu (en anglais - continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP]), est une forme de ventilation administrée sans l’usage d’un dispositif invasif au niveau des voies respiratoires (p. ex., tube endotrachéal). Elle est plutôt appliquée de façon non invasive via un dispositif comme un masque nasal, facial ou un masque facial complet ( full face ). La VNI a pour objectif de maintenir une ventilation alvéolaire et une teneur en oxygène du sang artériel adéquate afin de corriger toute acidose respiratoire et hypoxémie. Cet article, sous forme de « vrai ou faux », a pour objectif d’identifier les éléments importants du rôle infirmier lorsqu’une personne est ventilée de façon non invasive à l’urgence. Maintenant, saurez-vous distinguer le vrai du faux concernant la VNI ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoins d’urgence La revue de l’Association des infirmières et infirmiers d’urgence du QuébecSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207