MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393018551 · doi:10.7202/1101700ar

Reconnaître l’insuffisance cardiaque à l’urgence

2023· article· fr· W4393018551 on OpenAlexaff
Marc‐André Maheu‐Cadotte, Eva Romano, Claudie Roussy, Guillaume Fontaine

Bibliographic record

VenueSoins d’urgence La revue de l’Association des infirmières et infirmiers d’urgence du Québec · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart InstituteUniversité de MontréalInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les infirmières d’urgence sont confrontées sur une base régulière à des personnes vivant avec une insuffisance cardiaque décompensée. Toutefois, l’évaluation clinique de l’insuffisance cardiaque présente plusieurs défis puisqu’elle peut être associée à différentes causes et à un large éventail de mécanismes physiopathologiques. Cet article fait état de mythes et réalités associés à l’évaluation clinique de l’insuffisance cardiaque.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoins d’urgence La revue de l’Association des infirmières et infirmiers d’urgence du QuébecSame topicCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207