MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393018616 · doi:10.7202/1101701ar

Discussion avec William Tessier, porte-parole de l’Alliance pour l’avenir des soins infirmiers au Québec

2023· article· fr· W4393018616 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gabriela Peguero-Rodriguez, Alexandra Lapierre

Bibliographic record

VenueSoins d’urgence La revue de l’Association des infirmières et infirmiers d’urgence du Québec · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlliancePolitical scienceHumanitiesArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les rédactrices en chef de la revue Soins d’urgence se sont entretenues avec le porte-parole de l’Alliance pour l’avenir des soins infirmiers au Québec (AASIQ), M. William Tessier, un infirmier de la relève engagé. Les rédactrices ont le plaisir de vous présenter le fruit de leur conversation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0240.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0090.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoins d’urgence La revue de l’Association des infirmières et infirmiers d’urgence du QuébecSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207