MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393018616 · doi:10.7202/1101701ar

Discussion avec William Tessier, porte-parole de l’Alliance pour l’avenir des soins infirmiers au Québec

2023· article· fr· W4393018616 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gabriela Peguero-Rodriguez, Alexandra Lapierre

Bibliographic record

VenueSoins d’urgence La revue de l’Association des infirmières et infirmiers d’urgence du Québec · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlliancePolitical scienceHumanitiesArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les rédactrices en chef de la revue Soins d’urgence se sont entretenues avec le porte-parole de l’Alliance pour l’avenir des soins infirmiers au Québec (AASIQ), M. William Tessier, un infirmier de la relève engagé. Les rédactrices ont le plaisir de vous présenter le fruit de leur conversation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoins d’urgence La revue de l’Association des infirmières et infirmiers d’urgence du QuébecSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207