Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’expression « écologie politique » ne désigne pas tant un positionnement politique dans l’ordre des débats publics, mais un spectre politique avec sa gauche et sa droite. Les positions qui en découlent reposent de manières variées sur deux grands partis pris philosophiques. Tendanciellement : fait-on partie de la nature ou en dispose-t-on à sa convenance ? En sous-main, ces considérations politiques tiennent d’un engagement de nature théologique trouvant sa genèse au xviii e siècle, à l’époque où les tenants de « l’économie de la nature » tels que Carl von Linné et Gilbert White – les Arcadiens – contemplaient le monde comme l’oeuvre du Souverain créateur, et les Impériaux voyaient en lui une oeuvre inaboutie et chaotique, que Dieu leur avait donné la mission d’organiser et de parachever.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".