Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jepense,doncjesuis»énonçait Descartes, il y a de cela quatre siècles.Ce faisant, il établissait la réalité de l'être (et, bientôt, de son environne ment) à partir du seul constat de l'activité de la pen sée.Il est curieux de constater que ce postulat se rencontre encore aujourd'hui, mais d'une façon déformée, chez la plupart des gens.En effet, ainsi que j'entends le démontrer, la population en géné ral adopte à l'égard d'elle-même l'attitude sui vante: «Je le pense, donc je le suis», chaque indi vidu accordant davantage d'importance à ce qu'il pense être qu'à ce que ses comportements révè lent de lui-même.Or, comme les faits viennent sou vent contredire la pensée qu'ont les gens sur euxmêmes (qu'on me permette ici encore de recourir au raccourci de la formule afin de traduire ma pen sée), en définitive, «j'agis, donc je suis».Ces formules peuvent sembler abstraites, au premier abord.Il ne s'agit pourtant pas ici d'un vain
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.033 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.040 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.018 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.022 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".