MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393019427 · doi:10.7202/1104254ar

Approche de la peinture chinoise

2023· article· fr· W4393019427 on OpenAlexaff
Réal Rodrigue

Bibliographic record

VenuePetite revue de philosophie · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsCegep Edouard Montpetit
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À CarmenQu'est-ce que la nature pour un esprit qui sait se recueillir et contempler en silence, ou pour qui le sens du sacré ne fait pas défaut?La peinture chinoise, parti culièrement celle qui date de la Dynastie des Song, nous la dévoile.Mais elle ne se dévoile telle que pour ceux qui ont appris à l'accueillir comme un don pré cieux entre tous.Aux autres, elle ne «parle» pas ou reste muette.Afin de comprendre l'attitude orientale face à la nature, le commentaire que faisait T.D. Suzuki à propos des vers du poète Basho vaut la peine d'être entendu.Voici d'abord les vers apparemment bien simples du poète japonais

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePetite revue de philosophieSame topicChinese history and philosophyFrench-language works237,207