MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393019427 · doi:10.7202/1104254ar

Approche de la peinture chinoise

2023· article· fr· W4393019427 on OpenAlexaff
Réal Rodrigue

Bibliographic record

VenuePetite revue de philosophie · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsCegep Edouard Montpetit
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À Carmen Qu'est-ce que la nature pour un esprit qui sait se recueillir et contempler en silence, ou pour qui le sens du sacré ne fait pas défaut?La peinture chinoise, parti culièrement celle qui date de la Dynastie des Song, nous la dévoile.Mais elle ne se dévoile telle que pour ceux qui ont appris à l'accueillir comme un don pré cieux entre tous.Aux autres, elle ne «parle» pas ou reste muette.Afin de comprendre l'attitude orientale face à la nature, le commentaire que faisait T.D. Suzuki à propos des vers du poète Basho vaut la peine d'être entendu.Voici d'abord les vers apparemment bien simples du poète japonais Basho: Je regarde avec attention: Une nazuna en fleurs Au pied d'une haie!Yoku mireba Nazuna kana saku Kakine kana.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.021
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePetite revue de philosophieSame topicChinese history and philosophyFrench-language works237,207