MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393019431 · doi:10.7202/1105400ar

Introduction à la lecture de George Orwell

2023· article· fr· W4393019431 on OpenAlexaff
Jacques G. Ruelland

Bibliographic record

VenuePetite revue de philosophie · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsCegep de ThetfordCegep Edouard MontpetitCegep de Trois-RivieresDawson College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeorge (robot)ArtHumanitiesPhilosophyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Certaines personnes voient en 1984, le dernier roman crit par George Orwell avant sa mort, une sorte de testament littraire. Par ailleurs, nombre d'tudes tendent dmontrer que 1984 n'est pas un simple roman de science-fiction, mais un trs srieux avertissement de l'auteur contre le totalitarisme. Qu'en est-il exactement? Orwell considrait-il 1984 comme une prophtie ou comme une vision foudroyante de la situation mondiale au dbut de la guerre froide? Si l'auteur considrait luimme 1984 comme un cri d'alarme lanc contre la monte du totalitarisme, cela infirme-t-il l'hypothse selon laquelle 1984 est une oeuvre prophtique? 1984 constitue-t-il un roman original, particulier, dans l'oeuvre abondante de George Orwell, ou bien, sans le considrer comme une oeuvre autobiographique, ne peut-on y voir l'aboutissement de toute la conception orwellienne du socialisme? Ce texte tente d'apporter des lments de rponses ces diffrentes questions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePetite revue de philosophieSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207