MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393019571 · doi:10.7202/1106914ar

Kinguneq Ciunerkiurluku: Nunalget Elakengaliuryarait, Ayagyuat Ilagauciat, Paitait-llu Kuinerrami Alaska-mi

2023· article· en· W4393019571 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Charlotta Hillerdal, Alice Watterson, M. Akiqaralria Williams, Lonny Alaskuk Strunk, J. Cleveland

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes/Inuit/Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchHumanitiesSociologyGeologyGeographyArtArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kuinerrarmiut kinguvrita ayagniuskiit Tegganrita-llu cingumakiit Nunallermek Elakengaliuryaranek Caliarat [Nunalleq Archaeology Project] Yup’igni Alaska-rmiuni ayuqaitellruuq ayagniatni 2009-aami. Tuakenirnek nakmiin nunameggni caliamegteggun qulen allrakut cipluki elakengaliuryararluteng elakengengnaqellrianek, elakenganek yuvrilrianek, kangingnaurvigteggun qelkilrianek, 2018-aarnirnek-llu nunameggni elakengellmeng tamalkuita qellekviatnek. Elakengaliurtet Nutemllaat-llu Kinguvrita caliaritnek qanemcini Tegganret kinguvarturtet-llu arcaqaketuit. Tau͡gaam tamakut calillgutkuciat man’a engelkarrluku arcaqaqapigcaaqengraan Nunallermek caliaratnun, makuni eneqakaput ayagyuat anglillret Caliarat maliggluku, maa-i-llu elakengat tapeqluki paitaqsagutellruluki. Makuni igani qalarutkaput Nunallermek Elakengaliuryaranek Caliarata agtuumaciat nunalget paitaitnun, mumiggluku-llu nunalget ilagautellermegteggun elakengaliuryaranun agtuumaciat, atunem-llu yugnun paivtellerkiullrat. Qulen allrakut cipluki iluatni murilkelput umyuangcautekenqegcaarluki, qaillun-llu tamakucit nunalgutkellriit-llu calillguteksarait kinguvqaarni elluarcaryugngaciatnek.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0980.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes/Inuit/StudiesSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207