MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393023621 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.11032

FH-TabNet: Multi-Class Familial Hypercholesterolemia Detection via a Multi-Stage Tabular Deep Learning

2024· preprint· en· W4393023621 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sadaf Khademi, Zohreh Hajiakhondi, Golnaz Vaseghi, Nizal Sarrafzadegan, Arash Mohammadi

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsClass (philosophy)Familial hypercholesterolemiaArtificial intelligenceStage (stratigraphy)Computer scienceDeep learningMedicineInternal medicineBiologyCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder characterized by elevated levels of Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or its associated genes. Early-stage and accurate categorization of FH is of significance allowing for timely interventions to mitigate the risk of life-threatening conditions. Conventional diagnosis approach, however, is complex, costly, and a challenging interpretation task even for experienced clinicians resulting in high underdiagnosis rates. Although there has been a recent surge of interest in using Machine Learning (ML) models for early FH detection, existing solutions only consider a binary classification task solely using classical ML models. Despite its significance, application of Deep Learning (DL) for FH detection is in its infancy, possibly, due to categorical nature of the underlying clinical data. The paper addresses this gap by introducing the FH-TabNet, which is a multi-stage tabular DL network for multi-class (Definite, Probable, Possible, and Unlikely) FH detection. The FH-TabNet initially involves applying a deep tabular data learning architecture (TabNet) for primary categorization into healthy (Possible/Unlikely) and patient (Probable/Definite) classes. Subsequently, independent TabNet classifiers are applied to each subgroup, enabling refined classification. The model's performance is evaluated through 5-fold cross-validation illustrating superior performance in categorizing FH patients, particularly in the challenging low-prevalence subcategories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicImbalanced Data Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207