Déploiement d’un service d’urgence gériatrique : étude qualitative sur la perception des intervenants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Afin de répondre aux besoins particuliers d’une proportion de personnes aînées toujours grandissante qui fréquentent les urgences, le CIUSSS de l’Estrie-CHUS a déployé une série d’interventions simples et peu coûteuses d’un service d’urgence gériatrique (SUG). Pour que celles-ci aient les effets escomptés, il est primordial qu’elles soient appliquées et intégrées dans les pratiques des intervenants. Mieux comprendre comment les membres de l’équipe soignante perçoivent ces interventions s’avère dès lors incontournable afin de pouvoir mettre en lumière tant les forces que les défis du modèle de SUG. En adoptant une approche qualitative descriptive, cette étude vise ainsi à documenter l’évolution de l’application des interventions déployées au sein d’un SUG, ainsi que la perception des intervenants en regard de ces interventions dans l’exercice de leurs fonctions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".