MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393025260 · doi:10.1080/02626667.2024.2329774

Event-based rainfall analysis in Sinai, Egypt

2024· article· en· W4393025260 on OpenAlexaff
Tamer A. Gado, Mohamed Elkollaly, Yiping Guo, Rufayda M. El-Hagrsy, Mahmoud B. Mohameden, Basma A. Shalaby, Bahaa Elboshy, hewida omara, Mostafa El Sawwaf

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrological Sciences Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvent (particle physics)GeographyPhysicsAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates event-based rainfall characteristics in Sinai (Egypt) using hourly precipitation data from the Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP). A hierarchical cluster analysis of a 19-year dataset (2003–2021) identified five regions in Sinai. Distinct storms were identified using a minimum inter-event time of 5 h. The analysis of storm characteristics revealed that rainfall events in Sinai last from 1.7 to 3.6 h, with a mean storm volume of 6.4 mm. Rainfall intensity ranges from 1.7 to 4 mm/h, and the average dry period duration is 34 days. The northern region has the highest frequency of storms (25 events/year). The Weibull distribution was found to fit the best for all rainfall characteristics except for intensity, which was best represented by the generalized extreme value distribution. This study provides valuable insights about rainfall events in Sinai that can be applied to improve flood mitigation strategies and water resources management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHydrological Sciences JournalSame topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207