Aspects de la diffusion éditoriale de l’ Histoire et des Muses de la Nouvelle France de Marc Lescarbot
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The life and career of Marc Lescarbot (1570-1641), born in Vervins, have been extensively studied. They have been examined in monographs as well as critical editions of his books, and they shed light on the nature of his literary project. Particularly, they illuminate the reasons that led him to publish several books on history, on his travels in Acadia, as well as political pamphlets, French translations of religious matters, and books of poems about Canada and Switzerland. Altogether, his published works display his extensive engagement in public life. His most famous books are the Histoire de la Nouvelle France, completed with the poems of Les Muses de la Nouvelle France, that were published together in Paris in three editions (1609, 1611-1612, and 1617-1618). This article presents and examines several manuscript and published documents related to Marc Lescarbot’s career and provides a detailed description and a historical study of the publication of his early editions of the Histoire and Muses de la Nouvelle France. An inventory of known copies of their three original and augmented editions (1609, 1611-1612 and 1617-1618) is also provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".