MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PPPCT: Privacy-Preserving framework for Parallel Clustering Transcriptomics data

2024· article· en· W4393029108 on OpenAlexafffund
Ali Abbasi Tadi, Dima Alhadidi, Luis Rueda

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers in Biology and Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceCluster analysisData miningDimensionality reductionBig dataInformation privacyMachine learningComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single-cell transcriptomics data provides crucial insights into patients’ health, yet poses significant privacy concerns. Genomic data privacy attacks can have deep implications, encompassing not only the patients’ health information but also extending widely to compromise their families’. Moreover, the permanence of leaked data exacerbates the challenges, making retraction an impossibility. While extensive efforts have been directed towards clustering single-cell transcriptomics data, addressing critical challenges, especially in the realm of privacy, remains pivotal. This paper introduces an efficient, fast, privacy-preserving approach for clustering single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) datasets. The key contributions include ensuring data privacy, achieving high-quality clustering, accommodating the high dimensionality inherent in the datasets, and maintaining reasonable computation time for big-scale datasets. Our proposed approach utilizes the map-reduce scheme to parallelize clustering, addressing intensive calculation challenges. Intel Software Guard eXtension (SGX) processors are used to ensure the security of sensitive code and data during processing. Additionally, the approach incorporates a logarithm transformation as a preprocessing step, employs non-negative matrix factorization for dimensionality reduction, and utilizes parallel k -means for clustering. The approach fully leverages the computing capabilities of all processing resources within a secure private cloud environment. Experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of our approach in preserving patient privacy while surpassing state-of-the-art methods in both clustering quality and computation time. Our method consistently achieves a minimum of 7% higher Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) than existing approaches, contingent on dataset size. Additionally, due to parallel computations and dimensionality reduction, our approach exhibits efficiency, converging to very good results in less than 10 seconds for a scRNA-seq dataset with 5000 genes and 6000 cells when prioritizing privacy and under two seconds without privacy considerations. Availability and implementation Code and datasets availability: https://github.com/University-of-Windsor/PPPCT . • We presented a privacy-preserving framework to compute genomic data clustering. • We presented a novel clustering mechanism to compute the labels of the genomic data. • We proposed a new preprocessing and data-tuning technique which led to a higher clustering quality. • We developed a new parallelism technique to do computation extensive jobs in parallel. • We applied Intel Software Guard Extension to do secure parallel computation in cloud.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputers in Biology and MedicineSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207