Hashtag como elemento (des)organizador do discurso político
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo, com base na Análise de Discurso Materialista (AD), discute o modo pelo qual as hashtags (des)organizam os discursos político-midiáticos no X-Twitter. O corpus construído para o presente gesto analítico foi elaborado em torno da hashtag #quemmorreu, desde sua enunciação primeira até suas retomadas em outras vinte e uma publicações. Alicerçado nos postulados metodológicos da AD, o estudo observou as regularidades entre as circulações da hashtag para compreender a estruturação algorítmica de seus efeitos de sentido pela forma como significa os discursos nas redes digitais. As análises levaram à compreensão de um efeito de rumor derrisório, atrelado à forma do discurso polêmico, que desestabiliza poderes políticos e midiáticos estabelecidos, reivindicando outros sentidos pela contenda ideológica algoritmicamente mediada pela disputa acerca de #quemmorreu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".