MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393032312 · doi:10.55016/ojs/ajer.v70i1.76625

Single-Sex schooling at an Elite Independent School: A Multi-Methods Case Study

2024· article· en· W4393032312 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Daniel B. Robinson, Gregory R. L. Hadley, Jennifer Mitton

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Journal of Educational Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Roles and Identity Studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElitePsychologyMathematics educationEducational researchSociologyDevelopmental psychologyPolitical sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article focuses upon the milieu of single-sex schooling within an elite independent school in a Canadian urban centre. This research served as an exploratory and critical examination of single-sex schooling in a specific context, and considered its relevance, pedagogical effectiveness, and ability to meet its purported goals. Using an interpretative methodological framework, and employing a multi-methods case study design, the purpose of this research was to investigate the strengths, limitations, and possibilities of single-sex schooling in a particular educational context as informed by its students, parents of students, graduates, and teachers. We found little evidence to support the idea that single-sex schooling overwhelmingly impacted student academic or social development. Implications for practice at schools offering single-sex schooling are addressed and focus upon the importance of gender-inclusive schooling; the school as the key, rather than the school’s single-sex classes; and addressing boys’ behaviour. Key words: single-sex, gender, schooling, independent school, private school Cet article se penche sur un milieu de scolarisation non mixte au sein d’une école privée élitiste d’un centre urbain canadien. Cette recherche a permis d’examiner de façon exploratoire et critique la scolarisation non mixte dans un contexte précis, ainsi que sa pertinence, son efficacité pédagogique et sa capacité à atteindre les objectifs escomptés. Par l’utilisation d’un cadre méthodologique interprétatif et le recours à une étude de cas multimodale, cette recherche poursuivait l’objectif d’examiner les forces, les limites et les possibilités de l’enseignement en milieu non mixte, dans un contexte éducatif particulier, comme le décrivent les élèves, leurs parents, les diplômés et les enseignants. À la suite de cet examen, peu de preuves viennent soutenir l’idée que la scolarisation en milieu non mixte a un impact considérable sur le développement scolaire et social des élèves. L’article traite des implications pour la pratique dans les écoles offrant une scolarisation non mixte et se concentre sur l’importance d’une scolarisation inclusive des genres, sur l’école comme étant la clé plutôt que les classes non mixtes, et à considérer le comportement des garçons. Mots clés : non mixte, genre, scolarisation, école indépendante, école privée

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0180.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.274
GPT teacher head0.552
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Journal of Educational Research→Same topicGender Roles and Identity Studies→French-language works237,207→