MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393032562 · doi:10.32920/25413259

Validation of the CSA Z107.56 Standard Method for the Measurement of Noise Exposure From Headsets

2024· preprint· en· W4393032562 on OpenAlexaff
Alberto Behar, Gabe Nespoli, Tristan Loria, Frank Russo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise exposureNoise (video)Environmental scienceComputer scienceMedicineAudiologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The last section of the CSA Standard CAN/CSA-Z107.56-06 (R2011) - Procedures for the Measurement of Occupational Noise Exposure - deals with communication headsets. This section is typically applied in retail, call centers, airport control towers, and other settings where an operator is exposed to background noise while communicating with a headset. Because the user adjusts the volume to hear speech comfortably, the total equivalent sound level is a function of the level of the background noise minus the attenuation provided by the headset, plus a comfortable signal/noise ratio, estimated to be 13.5 dBA. Despite ample research demonstrating the role of spectral and temporal factors in speech masking, the standard is applied consistently regardless of the type of background.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNoise Effects and ManagementFrench-language works237,207