MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393032820 · doi:10.1109/tits.2024.3364250

Multi-Tree Compact Hierarchical Tensor Recurrent Neural Networks for Intelligent Transportation System Edge Devices

2024· article· en· W4393032820 on OpenAlexaff
Debin Liu, Laurence T. Yang, Ruonan Zhao, Xianjun Deng, Chenlu Zhu, Yiheng Ruan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIntelligent transportation systemArtificial neural networkEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionComputer scienceTree (set theory)Tensor (intrinsic definition)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematicsTransport engineeringGeometryCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and their variants can efficiently capture the features of time-series characteristic data and are widely used for intelligent transportation tasks. Internet of Vehicles (IoV) edge devices deploying RNN models are an important impetus for the development of intelligent transportation system (ITS) and provide convenient services for users and managers. However, the input data of some transportation tasks have high dimensional characteristics, resulting in the number of training parameters and computational complexity of RNN models being too large, making it difficult to deploy high-performance RNN models on resource-constrained IoV edge devices. To overcome this problem, we compress the training parameters of the RNN model using the proposed multi-tree compact hierarchical tensor representation-Dtensor Block Decomposition (DBD), which reduces the computational complexity of the model and speeds up the training process of the model, thus making the network model lightweight. We evaluate the performance of Dtensor Block-Long Short-Term Memory (DB-LSTM) and Improved Dtensor Block-LSTM (IDB-LSTM) models on multiple real datasets and compare them with the current state-of-the-art LSTM compression models. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method can massively compress the number of training parameters of the models on different datasets and shorten the training time of the models without degrading the testing accuracy of the models. In addition, our proposed DB-LSTM and IDB-LSTM models have better comprehensive performance compared with other models and are more suitable for deployment on resource-constrained IoV edge devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation SystemsSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207