MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393032899 · doi:10.1109/tits.2024.3375900

I2T: From Intention Decoupling to Vehicular Trajectory Prediction Based on Prioriformer Networks

2024· article· en· W4393032899 on OpenAlexaff
Yi Zhou, Zhangyun Wang, Nianwen Ning, Zhanqi Jin, Ning Lu, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooQueen's University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTrajectoryDecoupling (probability)Computer scienceEngineeringPhysicsControl engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A reliable driving trajectory prediction of surrounding vehicles is an essential reference for decision-making and safe driving of an autonomous vehicle. Although predicting short-term trajectories can be well achieved, it is still very challenging for long-term prediction of trajectories since the prediction space grows exponentially. In this paper, we propose a novel architecture for trajectory prediction from factored intention estimation (I2T), which decouples the trajectory prediction space into a high-level space for intention estimation and a low-level space for motion prediction. The long-term dependencies between intention cues and future motions during driving are naturally extended to the internal sharing mechanism of I2T, leading to improved performance. Furthermore, we design a Prioriformer model to serve as the backbone network for I2T so that it can accurately capture the long-term dependency couplings related to the task of intention estimation or motion prediction. Prioriformer model adopts a personalized normalization method, which facilitates learning latent representations of long-term features and avoids getting stuck on local optimum. A designed multi-scale fusion encoder extracts features from various receptive fields and then learns richer information from the representation subspaces. An efficient non-autoregressive decoder reduces the pressure in long-term prediction of trajectories while avoiding cumulative errors. Experiments on three real-world motion datasets show that I2T can significantly outperform the state-of-the-art.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation SystemsSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207