MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393037802 · doi:10.37779/nt.v24i3.4765

Different açaí by-products in nanostructured formulations: a brief literature review

2024· article· en· W4393037802 on OpenAlex
JÚLIA KUBASZEWSKI NUNES, Amanda Kolinski Machado, Dana El Soufi El Sabbagh, Alencar Kolinski Machado, Aline Ferreira Ourique

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDisciplinarum Scientia. Série Ciências Naturais e Tecnológicas · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPineapple and bromelain studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanotechnologyBiochemical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Açaí (Euterpe oleracea) is a fruit native to the Amazon rainforest which has several well-known properties. Its by-products have physicochemical limitations and the bioactive substances, specifically the polyphenols, are susceptible to degradation by oxidation during exposure to oxygen, humidity, light, high temperatures and pH alteration. In this context, nanotechnology is related to structures, properties and processes involving materials with dimensions on the nanometer scale, and can be used to overcome these limitations due to the fact that these particles are extensively researched because they offer many advantages over traditional formulations. The aim of this study was to prepare a literature review considering the different by-products of açaí, their biological activities and nanostructured materials to which açaí was complexed. The search was carried out using the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), PubMed and Web of Science databases, and articles were selected that were written in English, published between 2012 - 2023 and used the descriptors “nano*” AND “açaí” and “nano*” AND “Euterpe Oleracea”. The studies found showed that the most commonly used nanoformulation was the polymeric nanoparticle and three appeared with the same frequency, namely the metallic nanoparticle, nanoemulsion and nanofiber, while the most exploited by-products are oil, fruit and seeds. Majority of studies also found that açaí by-products nanoformulations are used in the food industry, in the creation of biodegradable materials, in the delivery of pharmaceuticals, and in the area of cosmetology. However, only a small number of studies showed evaluations of biological properties of these products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it