Targeted sampling of natural product space to identify bioactive natural product-like polyketide macrolides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polyketide or polyketide-like macrolides (pMLs) continue to serve as a source of inspiration for drug discovery. However, their inherent structural and stereochemical complexity challenges efforts to explore related regions of chemical space more broadly. Here, we report a strategy termed the Targeted Sampling of Natural Product space (TSNaP) that is designed to identify and assess regions of chemical space bounded by this important class of molecules. Using TSNaP, a family of tetrahydrofuran-containing pMLs are computationally assembled from pML inspired building blocks to provide a large collection of natural product-like virtual pMLs. By scoring functional group and volumetric overlap against their natural counterparts, a collection of compounds are prioritized for targeted synthesis. Using a modular and stereoselective synthetic approach, a library of polyketide-like macrolides are prepared to sample these unpopulated regions of pML chemical space. Validation of this TSNaP approach by screening this library against a panel of whole-cell biological assays, reveals hit rates exceeding those typically encountered in small molecule libraries. This study suggests that the TSNaP approach may be more broadly useful for the design of improved chemical libraries for drug discovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".