MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393044289 · doi:10.62347/fyge7020

Auricular acupressure combined with Tongtian oral liquid for acute attacks of migraine without aura: a single-center, retrospective study

2024· article· en· W4393044289 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yuanyuan Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Translational Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGovernment of Jiangsu Province
KeywordsMedicineAuraAcupressureMigraineNauseaAnesthesiaVomitingVisual analogue scaleFlunarizineIbuprofenTraditional Chinese medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of auricular acupressure combined with Tongtian Oral Liquid for immediate pain relief in patients with acute migraine without aura, and to analyze the risk factors that affect the number of acute attacks of migraine without aura. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data of 180 patients diagnosed with acute migraine without aura who were admitted to Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine). The patients were divided into an intervention group 1 (n=60), an intervention group 2 (n=60), and a control group (n=60) according to different treatment methods. The intervention group 1 received auricular acupressure + Tongtian oral liquid, the intervention group 2 received Jing point bloodletting + Tongtian oral liquid, and the control group received ibuprofen + flunarizine. Before treatment, 60 minutes and 120 minutes after treatment, the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) were used to score the pain in the three groups to evaluate the efficacy of immediate analgesia. Symptoms including fatigue, drowsiness, nausea, and vomiting after 2 hours of treatment were observed. The amount of ibuprofen used within 24 hours was calculated. The drug treatment was continued for one month. The frequency of migraine attacks was compared among the three groups. The relevant factors affecting the number of migraine attacks were analyzed. RESULTS: The VAS and SF-MPQ scores of the three groups were all decreased 120 minutes after treatment as compared with those before treatment (P<0.01). The decline rate in the intervention group 1 > that in intervention group 2 > that in control group (P<0.01). The immediate analgesic efficiency at 60 minutes, intervention group 1 > intervention group 2 > control group (100% vs. 76.67% vs. 56.67%, P<0.001). After 2 hours of treatment, more cases of fatigue and lethargy occurred in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in nausea and vomiting among the three groups (P>0.05). The 24-hour ibuprofen dosage and headache recurrence ratio, control group > intervention group 2 > intervention group 1 (P<0.05). The number of headache attacks within 30 days was significantly higher in the control group than in the intervention groups (P=0.012). There was no significant statistical difference between the two intervention groups (P=0.568). Regression analysis found that age (OR=1.036, 1.006-1.068), body mass index (OR=1.101, 1.008-1.201), hypertension (OR=2.879, 1.187-6.986), chronic gastritis (OR=2.839, 1.213-6.647), children with educational problems (OR=0.333, 0.164-0.676), and residual fatigue symptoms (OR=4.539, 1.828-11.271) affected the number of headache attacks within the one month of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Auricular acupressure combined with Tongtian Oral Liquid can relieve the acute pain of migraine without aura and reduce the number of pain episodes. The curative effect of this combination is better than that of western medicine alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Translational ResearchSame topicAcupuncture Treatment Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207