MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393053396 · doi:10.23977/jemm.2024.090105

Identification of time-frequency maps of bearing faults based on hyperparameter optimization SSA-GoogleNet

2024· article· en· W4393053396 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering Mechanics and Machinery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Diagnostics and Reliability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperparameterIdentification (biology)Bearing (navigation)Computer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to solve the problem of poor noise immunity of neural network in bearing fault detection and to meet the high demand for adaptive extraction ability of network features in the industrial field, this paper proposes a hyper-parameter optimization method to eliminate the error of human-set parameters. Aiming at the non-smoothness and non-linear characteristics of the bearing fault signal, the two-dimensional wavelet transform (2DWT) is used to extract the feature values of the vibration signal of the bearing fault, and it is proposed to use the CNN convolutional neural network (CNN) to train the fault model. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is proposed to be used for fault model training. Firstly, the 2D wavelet transform is applied to the bearing vibration signal to extract the time-frequency map of the vibration signal; secondly, the extracted time-frequency map is used as the training object of the convolutional neural network to train the model, and then multiple convolutional neural network frameworks are used for noise immunity test by adding Gaussian white noise to the original signal to construct the test framework, and then the framework with the best noise immunity is used as the base network; and then the CNN is used as the base network. Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA), Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), and Whale Optimization Algorithm (GWO) to find the best parameters. Validated by the public dataset of Western Reserve University, the method can effectively improve the fault identification accuracy of the model and can get rid of the problem of poor network robustness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it