MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393060409 · doi:10.24036/cived.v10i1.362112

Pengaruh Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) terhadap Perilaku Kuat Geser Tanah Terkontaminasi Batubara

2023· article· id· W4393060409 on OpenAlexaff
Andi Marini Indriani, Gunaedy Utomo

Bibliographic record

VenueCIVED · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Applications in Construction Materials
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalcitePrecipitationGeologyGeotechnical engineeringEnvironmental scienceMineralogyMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) adalah teknik perbaikan tanah dengan menggunakan mikroorganisme yang mampu mengubah dan meningkatkan sifat mekanik dan fisik. Dalam penelitian ini, uji geser langsung dengan mengacu pada standard SNI 03-3420-1994 digunakan untuk mengetahui pengaruh pengendapan calcite terhadap perilaku kuat geser tanah terkontaminasi batubara. Bakteri Bacillus subtilis sebanyak 6% ditambahkan ke dalam tanah yang terkontaminasi 5%, 10% dan 15% batubara. Bakteri yang digunakan menggunakan kultur 3 hari dimana berada pada fase stasioner. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terjadi peningkatan yang cukup baik terhadap nilai kohesi dan sudut geser dalam sebagai parameter kuat geser setelah masa pemeraman. Stabilisasi MICP pada tanah terkontaminasi 5% batubara meningkatkan kuat geser sebesar 3 kali lipat sedangkan pada tanah terkontaminasi 10% dan 15% batubara terjadi peningkatan kuat geser masing-masing sebesar 7 dan 15 kali lipat dibandingkan dengan tanah asli.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCIVEDSame topicMicrobial Applications in Construction MaterialsFrench-language works237,207