Abstract 3732: Peripheral pharmacodynamic activity of epcoritamab as monotherapy and in combination with rituximab + lenalidomide in patients with follicular lymphoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Epcoritamab (DuoBody®-CD3xCD20) is a subcutaneous IgG1 bispecific antibody that simultaneously binds to CD3 on T cells and CD20 on malignant B cells, inducing activation and cytotoxic activity of T cells to mediate killing of target lymphoma cells. Epcoritamab is approved in the US for the treatment of adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse and high-grade large B-cell lymphoma after ≥2 lines of systemic therapy (also approved in Europe, the UK, Japan, and Canada). Here we present the pharmacodynamic effects of epcoritamab as monotherapy (EPCORE NHL-1: NCT03625037) or in combination with rituximab + lenalidomide (R2) (EPCORE NHL-2: NCT04663347) in peripheral blood of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), a heterogeneous disease for which many patients have an unmet medical need for efficacious, well-tolerated, off-the-shelf therapies. Methods: In EPCORE NHL-1 expansion phase, adults with R/R FL received epcoritamab monotherapy; in EPCORE NHL-2, adults with R/R (arm 2) or newly diagnosed (ND) (arm 6) FL received epcoritamab combined with R2. B-cell markers and T-cell proliferation and activation markers in whole blood were assessed using validated flow cytometry assays. Cytokines in plasma were measured using a validated multiplex immunoassay. Results: Epcoritamab as monotherapy and in combination with R2 induced rapid depletion of circulating peripheral B cells (CD19+) in patients with detectable peripheral B cells at baseline. Additionally, within the first 2 cycles, epcoritamab monotherapy induced a transient elevation of peripheral CD8+ and CD4+ T cells expressing proliferation (Ki67+%) and activation (HLA-DR+% and PD-1+%) markers. R/R and ND patient groups treated with epcoritamab + R2 showed a trend for greater induction of proliferating and activated peripheral T cells. Likewise, elevation in T-cell absolute counts was observed from cycle 2 onward, with a trend of higher levels with epcoritamab + R2 vs epcoritamab monotherapy. In addition, a moderate but transient elevation of circulating cytokines including IFNγ, IL-6, and IL-10 during cycle 1 was observed with epcoritamab monotherapy and epcoritamab + R2. Importantly, IL-6 and IL-10 returned to approximate baseline levels prior to the subsequent dose. Compared with epcoritamab monotherapy, patients treated with epcoritamab + R2 showed a trend for lower median levels of IL-6 peaks 24 hours after the first full dose. Conclusion: The pharmacodynamic activity of epcoritamab combined with R2 in R/R and ND FL was consistent with epcoritamab’s mechanism of action as monotherapy. Epcoritamab + R2 showed a favorable pharmacodynamic profile with a trend toward increased T-cell activation and T-cell elevation, and lower IL-6 levels. These data support the ongoing phase 3 trial of epcoritamab + R2 compared with R2 alone in patients with R/R FL (EPCORE FL-1: NCT05409066). Citation Format: Han Si, Jimin Zhang, Monica Wielgos-Bonvallet, Lorenzo Falchi, Kim Linton, Wojciech Jurczak, David Belada, Işıl Altıntaş, Mariana Sacchi, Elena Favaro, Ali Rana, Daniela Hoehn, David Soong, Christopher W. Chiu, Maria Jure-Kunkel. Peripheral pharmacodynamic activity of epcoritamab as monotherapy and in combination with rituximab + lenalidomide in patients with follicular lymphoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3732.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".