Multispectral brain connectivity during visual attention distinguishes controlled from uncontrolled hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypertension-related changes in brain function place individuals at higher risk for cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. The existing functional neuroimaging literature has identified important neural and behavioural differences between normotensive and hypertensive individuals. However, previously-used methods (i.e. magnetic resonance imaging, functional near-infrared spectroscopy) rely on neurovascular coupling, which is a useful but indirect measure of neuronal activity. Furthermore, most studies fail to distinguish between controlled and uncontrolled hypertensive individuals, who exhibit significant behavioural and clinical differences. To partially remedy this gap in the literature, we used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to directly examine neuronal activity that is invariant to neurovascular coupling changes induced by hypertension. Our study included 52 participants (19 healthy controls, 15 controlled hypertensives, 18 uncontrolled hypertensives) who completed a modified flanker attention task during MEG. We identified significant oscillatory neural responses in two frequencies (alpha: 8-14 Hz, gamma: 48-60 Hz) for imaging and used grand-averaged images to determine seeds for whole-brain connectivity analysis. We then conducted Fisher-z tests for each pair of groups, using the relationship between the neural connectivity and behavioural attention effects. This highlighted a distributed network of regions associated with cognitive control and selective attention, including frontal-occipital and interhemispheric occipital connections. Importantly, the inferior frontal cortex exhibited a unique neurobehavioural relationship that distinguished the uncontrolled hypertensive group from the controlled hypertensive and normotensive groups. This is the first investigation of hypertension using MEG and identifies critical whole-brain connectivity differences based on hypertension profiles. KEY POINTS: Structural and functional changes in brain circuitry scale with hypertension severity and increase the risk of cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. We harness the excellent spatiotemporal precision of magnetoencephalography (MEG) to directly quantify dynamic functional connectivity in healthy control, controlled hypertensive and uncontrolled hypertensive groups during a flanker task. In the first MEG study of hypertension, we show that there are neurobehavioural relationships that distinguish the uncontrolled hypertensive group from healthy and controlled hypertensive group in the prefrontal cortex. These results provide novel insights into the differential impact of hypertension on brain dynamics underlying selective attention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".