MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393075940 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-6641

Abstract 6641: Improving response to bladder-sparing therapies by combining radiotherapy to immuno-potentiating agents in immunologically cold models of bladder cancer

2024· article· en· W4393075940 on OpenAlexaff
Éva Michaud, Sabina Fehric, Gautier Marcq, Jiamin Huang, Fabio Cury, Madhuri Koti, José João Mansure, Ciriaco A. Piccirillo, Wassim Kassouf

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityQueen's UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBladder cancerCancerRadiation therapyOncologyUrologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Radiation therapy (RT) is a promising approach for bladder-sparing in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Despite its efficacy, 30% of patients develop radioresistant tumors necessitating salvage surgery. Combining RT with immune checkpoint inhibitor was reported to have synergic effects on anti-tumor immunity. In addition, activation of the STING pathway induces cell death, cancer cell antigens release and presentation, and promote T cells trafficking into tumors. Previous in vivo results from our team using the immunologically ‘hot’ murine tumor model MB49 demonstrated significant improvement of survival and immune cell infiltration upon STING agonist treatment, when combined with RT and anti-PDL1 treatment. Oppositely, treating the ‘cold’ tumor model UPPL with a combination of RT and anti-PDL1 treatment did not improve survival compared to RT alone. Consistently, UPPL tumors present low T cell and high neutrophil infiltration in vivo. Thus, the main objective of the present study is to evaluate whether combining RT, anti-PDL-1 and STING agonist treatments can improve the immunogenicity of UPPL tumors. METHODS: Male C57BL/6 mice were subcutaneously injected with 5.106 UPPL cells then randomized into various treatment combinations of RT, anti-PDL-1 and STING agonist. Midpoint and endpoint tumors were harvested for flow cytometry and IHC and stools for 16S-sequencing. RESULTS: We report that RT-combined treatments delayed tumor growth and prolonged survival in vivo. Neighborhood analyses in tissue revealed that response to RT combinations associated with increased macrophages density in the vicinity of infiltrating CD8+ T cells and with gut enrichment in Faecalibaculum, Bifidobacterium, and Candidatus arthomitus. Network analyses showed strong positive correlations between pro-tumor neutrophil recruitment and beneficial gut microbes in non-responders. Network analyses revealed positive correlations between pro-tumor neutrophil recruitment and dysbiotic gut microbes in non-responders. Conversely, these same neutrophil populations were associated to families associated to gut health in responding mice. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest combining RT in cold tumors enhances the TME, boosting T cell function via macrophage support. Furthermore, distal gut microbes may impact local anti-tumor immunity by influencing neutrophil polarization. This study contributes to the limited literature exploring immune modulation in a conventionally 'cold' bladder tumor cell lines, which has implications for treating human resistant tumors. Citation Format: Eva Michaud, Sabina Fehric, Gautier Marcq, JiaMin Huang, Fabio Cury, Madhuri Koti, José Joao Mansure, Ciriaco Piccirillo, Wassim Kassouf. Improving response to bladder-sparing therapies by combining radiotherapy to immuno-potentiating agents in immunologically cold models of bladder cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6641.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→