Based on In Vitro and 3D Epidermal Skin Model: The Efficacy of Bletilla Striata Extract for Skin Care
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Bletilla Striata (Thunb. ex A. Murray) Rchb. f.) Is a native herb of the orchidaceae family. Modern pharmacological activity studies have shown that Bletilla striata mainly has pharmacological activities such as promoting blood circulation and hemostasis, promoting wound healing anticancer, anti-tumor disease-resistant pathogenic microorganisms, protecting mucosa, anti-ulcer, whitening and anti-oxygen, anti-aging, and immune regulation, which have been widely recognized and applied. Research on the efficacy of plant extracts mainly adopts in vitro testing methods, such as cell experiment and 3D skin model experiment. Objective: To evaluate the soothing effect of Bletilla striata extracton UVB-stimulated keratinocytes (HaCaT) and its barrier repair efficacy in Skinovo-Epi skin model. Methods: The soothing and barrier repairing effects of Bletilla striata extract were studied in vitro. The cytotoxicity of the sample was measured by MTT assay, and cytotoxicity to keratinocytes was evaluated by cell survival rate. The soothing effect was evaluated by detecting changes in inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1β, IL-8, TNF-α) secreted by UVB-stimulated keratinocytes with the sample treatment. Barrier repair efficacy was assessed in a Skinovo-Epi skin model by measuring changes in FLG (Filaggrin) and LOR (Loricrin) protein levels after topical application of the sample. Results: The sample showed low cytotoxicity on keratinocytes. The sample significantly reduced UVB-stimulated secretion of inflammatory cytokines in keratinocytes. Topical application of the sample increased FLG and LOR protein levels in the Skinovo-Epi skin model. Conclusions:Bletilla striata extract exhibits soothing and barrier repair activities in vitro. Bletilla striata extract reduces UVB-stimulated inflammation in keratinocytes and improves skin barrier function. The data provide novel experimental evidence supporting the innovative application of Bletilla striata for skin disorders. Bletilla striata has potential as a therapeutic herb for sensitive and damaged skin conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".