MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393084513 · doi:10.4000/dms.9954

La magistralité, une approche attentionnelle

2024· article· fr· W4393084513 on OpenAlexaff
Didier Paquelin

Bibliographic record

VenueDistances et médiations des savoirs · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyComputer scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionPar cette contribution à la rubrique « Débat-discussion », l’objectif est de discuter sous un prisme singulier la magistralité, figure centrale de la pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur depuis des décennies. Le propos est initié par la lecture du texte publié en 2015 dans cette même revue par Olivier Aïm et Anneliese Depoux intitulé « D’une magistralité à l’autre. Remédiation de l’ethos professoral par le dispositif des MOOC ». Dans leur article ces auteurs abordent le MOOC com...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.011
Scholarly communication0.0100.010
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDistances et médiations des savoirsSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207