Abstract 3536: Paracell: A high throughput, deep learning-based pipeline for single-cell phenotypic profiling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Variants of uncertain significance constitute the vast majority of missense variants, hampering the utility of genetic testing, despite its remarkable impacts on clinical diagnosis and decision-making. Although the sequencing and interpretation of genetic variants have been drastically improved in recent years, only about 2% of novel missense variants are currently clinically actionable. Therefore, a robust and scalable pipeline is desperately needed to provide functional evidence critical for variant interpretation. In this work, we demonstrate Paracell, a deep learning-based phenotypic profiling pipeline that leverages subcellular segmentation, high-dimensional single-cell phenotyping, and machine learning to classify the functional impact of variants. Paracell captures heterogeneity in cellular phenotypes and protein colocalization between variants and their signaling partners, as well as subcellular markers, and enables analysis at a single-cell resolution. Using a classification model trained on single-cell features extracted by Paracell, we were able to accurately classify cells from loss-of-function (LoF) variants based on their impact. After aggregating cellular profiles on a variant level, our pipeline was able to distinguish LoF variants from functional ones with high sensitivity and specificity. Our work demonstrates that Paracell is a robust and scalable method that can sensitively detect differences in single-cell phenotypic profiles. The systematic application of this pipeline will provide valuable functional evidence for variant interpretation, enhancing their clinical utility and accelerating personalized cancer care. Citation Format: David L. Nguyen, Jesse T. Chao. Paracell: A high throughput, deep learning-based pipeline for single-cell phenotypic profiling [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3536.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".