MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393086094 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-7525

Abstract 7525: Investigating B7-H3 as a checkpoint and antibody drug conjugate target across prostate cancer variants- both androgen receptor dependent and independent

2024· article· en· W4393086094 on OpenAlexaff
Nikita Mundhara, Shivang Sharma, Emirhan Tekoglu, Ezra Baraban, Nathan A. Lack, Eugene Shenderov

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstate cancerAndrogen receptorConjugateAntibody-drug conjugateMedicineCancerDrugCancer researchProstateAntibodyOncologyInternal medicineMonoclonal antibodyPharmacologyImmunologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: CD276 (B7-H3) has recently emerged as a promising presumptive immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) target for PCa. Unfortunately, current immunotherapy trials have yielded few objective responses in PCa and hormonal therapy seldom cures necessitating the need to develop new immunotherapy or targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) treatment options for PCa, including B7-H3 targeted approaches. Method: In this work, we evaluated important ADC targets and immune checkpoints (PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, LAG3, TIGIT, OX40, 4-1BB, CTLA4, STEAP1, STEAP2, PSMA, NECTIN1, TROP-2, DLL3 and B7-H3) in various PCa cell lines and multiple patients spanning various subtypes of PCa using publicly available bulk RNA sequencing data and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data respectively. The results were validated at RNA and protein levels in listed cell lines. Further, the impact of androgen receptor (AR) signaling on B7-H3 expression was quantified using charcoal stripped media, AR agonist (R1881) and antagonist (enzalutamide) using real-time PCR and flow cytometry at RNA and protein levels respectively. Results: We found that B7-H3 shows high expression and very low variability compared to other ADC targets and immune checkpoints in AR-positive (LnCAP), hormone-refractory (VCAP), Castrate resistant (22RVI), AR negative (PC3, DU145), and neuroendocrine (H660) cell lines, as well as in—PCa cells and tumor microenvironment (TME) myeloid cells—of multiple patients spanning various subtypes of PCa. Western blotting confirms the ubiquitous presence of B7-H3 in all these cell lines, even when PSMA is absent. Furthermore, B7-H3 expression was modifiable via androgen depletion, R1881 supplementation, or addition of the AR antagonist enzalutamide. These changes were significant in AR-positive LnCAP cells compared to AR-negative DU145 cells further endorsing the crosstalk between AR and B7-H3 signaling pathways, which will be presented in greater detail. Conclusion: This work explores the therapeutic relevance of important ADC targets and immune checkpoints for Prostate Cancer (PCa), highlighting B7-H3 as a unique therapeutic ADC and ICI candidate across the continuum of PCa—androgen sensitive, castration resistant, and neuroendocrine—due to its stable expression across various subtypes and on TME myeloid cells. The relationship between AR and B7-H3 opens the possibility of future combination therapies based on this interaction. Citation Format: Nikita Mundhara, Shivang Sharma, Emirhan Tekoglu, Ezra G. Baraban, Nathan A. Lack, Eugene Shenderov. Investigating B7-H3 as a checkpoint and antibody drug conjugate target across prostate cancer variants- both androgen receptor dependent and independent [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 7525.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.378 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→