MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393087838 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-5169

Abstract 5169: Circulating levels of ANGPTL3, PCSK9, apoCIII and lipoprotein (a) in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

2024· article· en· W4393087838 on OpenAlexaff
Emilie Wong Chong, France‐Hélène Joncas, Pierre Douville, Dimcho Bachvarov, Frédéric Calon, Nabil G. Seidah, Caroline Diorio, Anne Gangloff

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsMontreal Clinical Research InstituteUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPCSK9MedicineInternal medicineOvarian cancerSerous ovarian cancerEndocrinologySerous fluidCancerLipoproteinCholesterolOncologyLDL receptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Ovarian cancers require abundant amounts of lipids for their growth. Recent years have highlighted the role of ANGPTL3, PCSK9, ApoCIII and Lp(a) as key players in lipid metabolism. But circulating levels of these factors in ovarian cancers have not been thoroughly investigated to date. Objective: We assessed the profiles of plasma ANGPTL3, PCSK9, ApoCIII and Lp(a) in ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Methods: Plasma samples collected from women diagnosed with an HGSC (n=31) or a benign ovarian lesion (BOL, n=40) were analyzed for plasma lipid profile (ApoB, total cholesterol, HDL, triglycerides, Lp(a) levels) on a clinical modular platform (Roche). ApoCIII, ANGPTL3 and PCSK9 levels were measured with commercially-available ELISA kits. Differences between HGSC and BOL were assessed by two-group comparisons. Pairwise correlation strength between variables was evaluated with Spearman’s rank order tests. Logistic regression modelling was used to further examine the associations between selected variables and HGSC diagnoses. Results: ANGPTL3 levels increased in HGSC (84.1 ng/ml, SD=29.2ng/ml, n=31) compared to BOL (66.9ng/ml, SD=30.7 ng/ml, n=40; HGSC vs BOL p=0.02). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve suggested that plasma ANGPTL3 levels were moderately associated with HGSC (AUC=67.7%, p=0.005 1) and did not increase predictive performance of ovarian tumor biomarkers CA125 and HE4 in multivariable model. Associations between ANGPTL3 levels and cholesterol (HDL, non-HDL, LDL and total) could be observed in the control group but not in the HGSC group. The same dissociation was observed for the inverse correlation between HDL and triglycerides in HGSC. Furthermore, moderate associations were observed between PCSK9 & CA19-9 in the entire cohort (rho=0.34, n=53, p=0.013) and Lp(a) & CA125 in HGSC cases (rho=0.51, p= 0.017). Conclusion: In this cohort of 71 women, we report increased levels of ANGPTL3 in HGSC with an effect size (Cohen’s D) of 0.57. Confirmation of this result in larger cohort studies (minimal n>50 in each group) would warrant further investigation into the roles of circulating ANGPTL3. Its inhibition may allow to tackle deregulated lipid metabolic pathways contributing to ovarian cancer progression. Citation Format: Emilie Wong Chong, France-Hélène Joncas, Pierre Douville, Dimcho Bachvarov, Frédéric Calon, Nabil Seidah, Caroline Diorio, Anne Gangloff. Circulating levels of ANGPTL3, PCSK9, apoCIII and lipoprotein (a) in high-grade serous ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5169.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207