MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393088736 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-7445

Abstract 7445: Association between C-reactive protein and cognitive impairment in IDH-mutant gliomas

2024· article· en· W4393088736 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
McKenzie C. Kauss, Michelle L. Wright, Dhaivat Raval, Emory Hsieh, Kaitlynn Slattery, Terri S. Armstrong, Tito R. Mendoza, Vivian A. Guedes

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMutantAssociation (psychology)Cognitive impairmentBiologyCognitionNeuroscienceGeneticsPsychologyGenePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cognitive impairment is common in primary brain tumor (PBT) patients, as a result of the disease and secondary damage from directed and systemic therapy. Recently, the risk in patients with IDH-mutant gliomas and role of interconnectivity of the tumor with neurons and the tumor microenvironment has heightened interest in exploration of biomarkers of impairment to inform care. Here, we investigate Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores and peripheral blood levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) in a cross-sectional cohort of 47 adult IDH-mutant PBT patients enrolled in a natural history study (NHS, NCT02851706: PI T. Armstrong). MoCA raw scores (range 0-30) were dichotomized (≤ 25 = cognitive dysfunction). Baseline CRP was quantified in banked serum samples in duplicate using (V-Plex/Vascular Injury Panel-2, Meso Scale Discovery [MSD], Rockville, MD) in a QuickPlex SQ 120 instrument (MSD). Lab personnel were blinded to diagnosis and clinical status. To reduce skewness in CRP raw values, we used log transformation. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and logistic regression were conducted using IBM SPSS and SAS Statistics software. The sample was predominately male (62%), white (70%), with high-grade gliomas (III/IV) (68%) and an average age at diagnosis of 36 years (SD: 9; median: 34; range: 20-53). The mean MoCA score was 25 (SD: 5; median: 26; range: 11-30). Dichotomizing MoCA scores showed that less than half (43%) of participants exhibited moderate-severe (≤ 25) cognitive impairment. MoCA binary group was negatively correlated with levels of CRP (r=-0.42, p<.003). The log mean concentration of CRP was higher in participants with cognitive impairment (7.99, SD=0.47 vs 7.57, SD=0.45, p<.003) than those without impairment. Finally, when controlling for age and sex, CRP remained predictive of cognitive impairment (OR 8.18, 95% CI 1.70,39.23). Higher levels of CRP were associated with lower MoCA scores in a cross-sectional sample of patients with IDH-mutant gliomas, suggesting an association between the severity of inflammation and cognitive impairment in IDH-mutant glioma patients. Further analysis in large, more diverse longitudinal cohorts will be needed to validate these findings in this population and compare to those with IDH-WT tumors and develop predictive models to inform biomarker development. Citation Format: McKenzie C. Kauss, Michelle L. Wright, Dhaivat Raval, Emory Hsieh, Kaitlynn Slattery, Terri S. Armstrong, Tito R. Mendoza, Vivian A. Guedes. Association between C-reactive protein and cognitive impairment in IDH-mutant gliomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 7445.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→