Abstract 1066: Colocalization of ovarian cancer-associated biomarkers in tumors, cancer cells and extracellular vesicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: We have previously shown that ovarian cancer can be detected with high specificity and sensitivity by interrogating colocalized membrane-associated cell-surface biomarkers on single tumor-associated extracellular vesicles (EVs). Our blood based Ovarian Cancer Test (OC Test) is composed of 5 cancer-associated biomarkers (BST-2, FOLR1, MUC-1, MUC-16, and sialylated Thomsen-nouveau antigen (sTn)) known to be overexpressed in ovarian cancer relative to healthy tissues. The test employs these 5 biomarkers in 3 combinations to capture and detect EVs from human plasma to distinguish high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) from both benign ovarian tumors and normal samples. Using super-resolution microscopy on ovarian cancer cell lines and EVs and multiplex immunohistochemistry of ovarian benign and tumor tissue, our study aimed to show that the 5 ovarian cancer biomarkers show 1) colocalization on ovarian cancer cells, 2) colocalization on the surface of EVs, and 3) colocalization on cancer cells within ovarian tumor biopsies. Methods: Super-resolution microscopy was employed to visualize stained biomarkers on the cell surface of a collection of ovarian cancer cell lines as well as on the surface of extracellular vesicles released by these cell lines. 58 HGSC (17 Stage I, 30 Stage II, and 10 Stage III) and 17 benign ovarian tumor K2EDTA plasma samples and paired FFPE tissue were sourced from the Ovarian Cancer Research Program (OVCARE, Vancouver BC, Canada). A tumor microarray from identical tissue samples was stained with an Opal multiplex-IHC (mIHC) assay comprised of antibodies to BST2, MUC1, sTn, and pan-cytokeratin and a DAPI counterstain. Machine learning based image analysis was utilized to determine colocalization of the biomarkers at the cellular level within benign and tumor tissue. RNA sequencing was carried out to assess expression levels of the biomarkers in each FFPE tissue sample. OC Tests were run on each plasma sample. Results: Super-resolution microscopy showed colocalization of OC Test combination biomarkers on ovarian cancer cells and EVs derived therefrom. Machine learning-based image analysis of tumor and benign tissue microarrays stained for BST2/MUC1/sTn using mIHC, showed strong evidence for colocalization of these biomarkers on single cells within ovarian tumor tissue, particularly in early-stage tumors, but not on benign tissue. RNA sequencing analysis showed good correlation of biomarker RNA expression levels and with the OC Test results. Conclusions: The results presented here demonstrate that the OC Test biomarkers are colocalized on tumor tissue, ovarian cancer cells, and EVs from ovarian cancer cell lines. RNA and protein expression levels show good correlation with OC Test results. These results provide further evidence that colocalized biomarkers on EVs can be utilized for early detection of cancer. Citation Format: Anthony D. Couvillon, Emily S. Winn-Deen, Shelby Thornton, Shuhong Liu, Michael DeRan, Maciej Pacula, Sanchari Banerjee, Daniel Gusenleitner, Laura T. Bortolin, Jonian Grosha, Timothy Santos-Heiman, Gabrielle Sangiuliano, Kelly M. Biette, Christopher R. Sedlak, Bilal Hamzeh, Delaney M. Byrne, Peter A. Duff, Julie Ho, Dongxia Gao, Amy Jamieson, Lauren T. Cuoco, MacKenzie S. King, Dawn R. Mattoon, Toumy Guettouche, Jessica N. McAlpine, David Huntsman. Colocalization of ovarian cancer-associated biomarkers in tumors, cancer cells and extracellular vesicles [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1066.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".